Deepmarket – TOR Scam Report (1)
Onion Link: http://deepmexzsejpzqid3k7knaas2p73dko6kxgpou7oey7vqtmrhopjyqyd.onion
Scam Report Date: 2024/10/03
Client Scam Report Breakdown
Original Report Summary:
In this scam report, the client describes a negative experience with a seemingly reputable vendor on an online marketplace. According to the original report, “The site looks very convenient and does not arouse suspicion, because the sellers have many positive reviews.” This statement highlights the deceptive nature of scam websites that rely on fake reviews to build trust among potential buyers. These fabricated or manipulated reviews create an illusion of legitimacy, masking fraudulent operations. The client’s initial trust in the site was fostered by these reviews, leading them to feel comfortable making a purchase. Scammers frequently exploit this tactic, building credibility with fake positive feedback that attracts unsuspecting victims. In this case, the client fell victim to a scam involving an Instagram hacking service.
The fraudulent nature of the transaction is evident when the client explains, “I paid $200 to the seller for the Instagram hack, but since then there has been no news, the seller does not respond.” This reflects a classic non-delivery scam, where a vendor collects payment without delivering the promised service or product. Instagram hacking, which is illegal and violates platform terms of service, is a sought-after service on black market platforms, often advertised as a quick fix for gaining control over an account. However, such services are often just bait to scam individuals out of their money, as seen in this case. After the transaction, the seller became unresponsive, a common red flag indicating fraudulent activity. This lack of communication is a telltale sign of a scammer who has no intention of following through on their promises.
In the final part of the report, the client adds, “The support service does not either, apparently this is the same person. The site is a scam.” Here, the client points out another hallmark of fraudulent platforms: unresponsive or nonexistent customer support. Scammers often create fake customer service departments to further deceive buyers into thinking they are interacting with a legitimate operation. In this instance, the client suspects that the seller and support service are the same person, which is a plausible scenario in scam operations where the scammer runs multiple aspects of the site. The report concludes with a firm assertion that “the site is a scam,” a conclusion drawn from the lack of service, communication, and support after payment. This case serves as a reminder of the risks associated with engaging in illegal or dubious transactions on seemingly trustworthy platforms, especially when sellers and sites leverage fake reviews to lure victims.
