Table of Contents
Toggledeep market – TOR Scam Report (1)
Onion Link: http://deepmarne5omhtp7yk5fduc6kopzabwh565qmgjux2mqfrczp6mhpgad.onion
Scam Report Date: 2024/10/01
Client Scam Report Breakdown
Original Report Summary:
The report begins with a letter of guarantee, purportedly provided by a service called “Mixero” to confirm a transaction between two cryptocurrency addresses. The letter of guarantee is an essential part of the scam, as it serves as a supposed proof of transaction. According to the report, the address generated to receive funds was bc1qtswf6zp0cy8v8d6vevtcxfa0auqq6eukv4rpuy, while the destination address for the final transaction was 17WB8rwsNAgUU5jyqUqYoYhWsgEsaFoGcp. The Order ID associated with this transaction is 66fb1fe10912e8.85391660, and a 2.3% fee is charged for this transfer. Despite the formal language and presentation, this document contains elements commonly seen in online scams, such as the cryptographic signature section, which could lead the client to believe the transaction is legitimate. However, signatures in cryptocurrency transactions are often misused in scams to give an air of authenticity.
Terminology used in this report is essential to understanding the scam dynamics. For instance, the “letter of guarantee” is a document that scammers commonly use to reassure victims that their funds are being handled securely. In a legitimate context, a letter of guarantee is a legal commitment to repay or fulfill a contract, often seen in financial agreements. However, in this case, it is a forged document meant to convince the victim of the scam’s authenticity. The cryptographic signature, another technical term, is presented as H+C04aakfXdfd/U1D3vrwIxAK3mJPTsFC4yX/aGSuYG7MM2H1NTQNZbo5U1NOLTmtABH0/H3KJPToFA1aAkFZtI=, which is included to add an additional layer of supposed legitimacy. Cryptographic signatures are legitimate in cryptocurrency transactions, ensuring the integrity and authenticity of the data; however, scammers often manipulate them or provide fake ones to deceive victims into thinking the transaction is secure.
One critical feature of this report is the request for the recipient to send the “letter of guarantee” back within 24 hours in case of any issues with the payment. This time constraint is a red flag in scam reports as it creates a false sense of urgency, a psychological tactic that pushes victims to act without thoroughly investigating the situation. Furthermore, the warning that failure to comply would render the letter obsolete, according to their “Confidentiality of Data” policy, reinforces the scam’s attempt to rush the victim into a quick response. Scammers frequently use these urgency tactics to prevent victims from having time to notice irregularities or inconsistencies in the transaction, thus heightening the likelihood of falling for the scam. In legitimate transactions, such policies around guarantees or refund windows are typically much clearer and offer greater flexibility to the client, allowing them time to resolve issues without immediate consequences.