fast cash – TOR Scam Report (2)
Onion Link: http://56hftwqkfy3c7doy6cltdg765dbno3rpwdaslfeba4jgjao6ojclswyd.onion
Scam Report Date: 2024/09/21
Client Scam Report Breakdown
Original Report Summary:
The client in this scam report describes a common case of non-delivery fraud, in which the scammer, after receiving payment, ceases communication and fails to fulfill the agreed-upon request. The user reports: “I completed the request and paid the money, but he did not answer me and did not send my request.” This type of scam often occurs on anonymous marketplaces, where both parties remain largely untraceable. The phrase “completed the request” indicates that the buyer submitted all necessary information or specifications related to the service or product ordered. In this context, the “request” likely refers to the initial agreement between the buyer and the seller regarding the terms of the transaction, which might include details such as the type of product or service, delivery timeline, and payment method. This is a clear-cut example of transactional fraud, where a breach of contract occurs after the payment has been made, but the promised service or product is never delivered.
Photos:
The key term “defrauded” is central to this case, signifying that the client was deceived out of their money through dishonesty or misrepresentation. The user further elaborates: “Before that, he was not late in responding. After he received the money, he stopped talking to me.” This highlights an essential element of the scam—the shift in behavior after the scammer secures payment. Before payment, the scammer was communicative and seemingly trustworthy, ensuring the client felt secure enough to proceed with the transaction. In many scam scenarios, especially in digital marketplaces, this tactic is employed to build trust, only for the scammer to disappear or ‘ghost’ the victim once they receive the funds. The scammer may also use common psychological techniques such as urgency or politeness to push the buyer into finalizing the deal before disappearing.
Lastly, the client mentions: “This video proves my words.” This likely refers to evidence collected by the victim, possibly a screen recording of interactions or proof of payment. In scam cases, especially those conducted in anonymous or semi-anonymous environments like the dark web, video or other forms of evidence play a crucial role in substantiating claims. While such evidence may help the victim’s case, recovering the lost funds in such circumstances is often difficult due to the decentralized nature of transactions on these platforms. Fraudsters commonly use encrypted communication methods and cryptocurrency payments, which provide them with additional layers of protection from being traced. Therefore, while the client’s video might be compelling proof of fraud, the lack of a centralized authority to mediate disputes makes it difficult to resolve such cases without significant technical expertise or cooperation from law enforcement.
Terminology Definition:
Non-delivery fraud: A scam where a seller takes payment for goods or services but fails to deliver the items as promised.
Transactional fraud: A type of fraud where one party in a financial transaction breaches the agreement after receiving payment.
Defrauded: To deceive someone out of money or goods, often through false pretenses or misrepresentation.
Ghosting: A tactic where the scammer suddenly stops all communication after receiving the payment.
Cryptocurrency payments: A digital currency used in many online marketplaces, often providing anonymity to both buyer and seller.
Evidence collection: Methods like screen recordings or proof of payment that serve as documentation to prove fraudulent activity.
