PremiumCards – TOR Scam Report (1)
Onion Link: http://hbl6udan73w7qbjdey6chsu5gq5ehrfqbb73jq726kj3khnev2yarlid.onion
Scam Report Date: 2024/03/10
Client Scam Report Breakdown
Original Report Summary:
In this report, the client describes an interaction where they made a purchase from a vendor but did not receive the product. The client states that after making payment and providing proof of the transaction via a screenshot, the vendor requested proof of payment again. Despite the client complying with this request by resending the proof, the vendor ceased communication, leaving the transaction unresolved. This report suggests that the vendor may have engaged in fraudulent behavior by avoiding further contact after confirming the payment was made. Such cases are not uncommon on darknet marketplaces where communication methods and accountability are limited, often leading to cases of buyers being scammed after payment is completed.
One important term that appears in this report is “proof of payment.” In the context of online transactions, proof of payment generally refers to a document or screenshot that verifies the buyer has fulfilled their end of the transaction. This can include a receipt, a transaction ID from a cryptocurrency wallet, or a screenshot showing the successful transfer of funds. The fact that the vendor in this case requested proof of payment more than once may indicate a stall tactic or an attempt to buy time before disappearing, a common strategy used by scammers on dark web platforms to delay the buyer’s pursuit of a refund or further action. The term “disappeared” used by the client could mean that the vendor either deleted their profile, blocked the buyer’s contact, or stopped responding entirely.
The client mentions that they were “already paid” before the vendor stopped responding, highlighting another key issue often seen in darknet markets: the lack of a formal dispute resolution mechanism. While some markets have escrow services, where the platform holds the buyer’s funds until the product is confirmed to be delivered, many transactions rely on direct payments to vendors, leaving buyers vulnerable to scams. The absence of a centralized authority means that if a vendor chooses to “disappear” after receiving payment, there is often little recourse for the buyer. In this case, the vendor’s refusal to respond and failure to deliver the product can be interpreted as a scam, since the client took the necessary steps to confirm their payment and uphold their side of the deal, yet received no resolution.
