Tor Amazon – TOR Scam Report (1)
Onion Link: http://amazonuzx7moazplksr5cqzihjse2fodsm67j3d5gu3azwzswifr5yad.onion
Scam Report Date: 2024/08/28
Client Scam Report Breakdown
Original Report Summary:
The client report opens with a statement that the vendor advertised instant delivery of their products or services. The term “instant” is crucial here, as it implies a transaction in which the buyer receives their purchased item or service within a short period, often moments after completing payment. The client points out that, in most reviews from other users, the delivery time typically spanned around two hours. This sets an expectation for the buyer to anticipate fulfillment of their order within a similar timeframe. However, the user’s experience vastly differs, as they are still waiting for their product nearly 48 hours after placing the order. This long delay raises concerns about the legitimacy of the vendor and the platform.
Photos:
Citing the original report, the user mentions that they have received “no contact from the vendor or site host.” In this context, the term “vendor” refers to the seller offering goods or services on the platform, while the “site host” is the administrator or moderator of the platform who should intervene in cases where disputes arise. The lack of communication from both parties is a red flag in deep web marketplaces like Tor Amazon, where buyers rely heavily on vendor and platform responsiveness to ensure that transactions are completed smoothly. The failure to provide updates or responses signals a potential scam, as legitimate vendors are typically eager to maintain positive communication to preserve their reputation.
In terms of protections offered on these marketplaces, terms like “escrow” and “buyer protection” are often highlighted as safeguards for users. Escrow services hold the buyer’s cryptocurrency until the transaction is confirmed as successful, offering a layer of protection. However, in this case, the user might not have the option to trigger a dispute or request a refund from the escrow system, given the lack of communication. Furthermore, platforms like Tor Amazon, which advertise features like “cryptocurrency escrow with a bitcoin back guarantee,” should facilitate these types of resolutions, but the failure to do so in this instance suggests a lapse in platform security, vendor screening, or possibly even platform complicity in fraudulent activity.
Thus, the user’s experience, when segmented by citing the original complaint and defining key terms, indicates that the vendor and possibly the platform itself may be involved in a scam. The advertised instant delivery was clearly unmet, and the communication blackout from both the vendor and the site host further raises suspicion. The inclusion of features such as escrow and buyer protection, while typically providing peace of mind, seem to have been ineffective in this instance. This scam highlights the ongoing risks involved in transacting on deep web marketplaces like Tor Amazon, where even the best-laid protections can fail.
