TOR Market – TOR Scam Report (1)
Onion Link: http://torbnsl6wuknjbv6bye7mbfmjwuhzatrp3t4hjft3dvzijcihui7tjyd.onion
Scam Report Date: 2024/08/07
Client Scam Report Breakdown
Original Report Summary:
In this report, the client details their experience ordering from an online marketplace, where they purchased a product listed as “70 cat Mundi MS Contin” for $899 USD. Following the purchase, the client was expecting to receive a confirmation number via email; however, the email never arrived. They also encountered issues with the website’s contact or dispute links, which prevented them from reaching support. Additionally, attempts to upload a screenshot of their order page through the Tor browser were unsuccessful, as the browser reportedly got stuck during the process. The order number provided for reference is 339.
Terminology and Report Clarifications
To clarify the client’s report, several terms and references need explanation. The product “70 cat Mundi MS Contin” refers to “70 tablets of Mundi-brand MS Contin,” a prescription-grade controlled substance. MS Contin is a formulation of morphine sulfate, a strong opioid pain reliever typically regulated by medical providers. The phrase “confirmation number” indicates an order-specific identifier that the client expected via email as proof of their transaction and to verify the legitimacy of the purchase. The “contact/dispute link” references a website feature where customers can submit concerns or initiate disputes over orders. The client’s use of the Tor browser — an anonymizing web browser often associated with accessing deep web sites — aligns with their need for secure, private access but may also contribute to technical challenges such as the “Initializing” issue they reported while trying to upload a screenshot.
Analysis and Recommendations
The core issues reported involve the lack of communication, a nonfunctional customer support mechanism, and technical complications with the Tor browser. First, the failure to receive a confirmation number raises concerns about whether the platform completes orders upon payment or fails in record-keeping. Without confirmation, the client lacks verification for their transaction, undermining their ability to track the order or file a formal dispute. Second, the broken contact link suggests poor site maintenance or a deliberate obstruction to prevent dispute filings, raising questions about the site’s credibility. Lastly, the client’s inability to upload supporting evidence due to Tor’s initialization issue highlights a broader issue for users who rely on Tor for accessing such platforms. In light of these findings, recommending the client to avoid further purchases on this platform until significant site functionality improvements are made would be prudent. Moreover, exploring alternative methods for uploading evidence might help clients substantiate their claims should similar issues arise.
